\tMarx \u015f\u00f6yle yaz\u0131yor:<\/p>\n
\t”Her yeni tarihsel a\u015famada, eski yan\u0131lg\u0131lar, bir an i\u00e7in yeniden ortaya \u00e7\u0131karlar.” [”Nas\u0131l ki tarihsel her yeni a\u015famada, eski yan\u0131lg\u0131lar, ortadan kaybolduktan hemen sonra, bir an i\u00e7in yeniden ortaya \u00e7\u0131karlarsa, ayn\u0131 bi\u00e7imde Enternasyonal i\u00e7inde de, her ne kadar daha az belirgin bir bi\u00e7imde olsa da, sekter \u015fubelerin yeniden ortaya \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc.”] [ANAR\u015e\u0130ZM \u00dcZER\u0130NE, Marx – Engels, s. 69]\n
\tMarx’\u0131n bahsetti\u011fi sekter \u015fubeler, \u0130svi\u00e7re, \u0130talya, \u0130spanya ve k\u0131smen Bel\u00e7ika’da ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan Bakuninci anar\u015fist sektlerin (tarikat, mezhep) kurdu\u011fu \u015fubelerdi. Bunlar daha \u00f6nce Proudhoun ve Stirner gibi k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck burjuva d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcrlerden ald\u0131klar\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncelerle Enternasyonal’in Genel Konseyi’ne ve Marx’a sava\u015f a\u00e7m\u0131\u015flard\u0131. Marxizme y\u00f6nelttikleri di\u011fer ele\u015ftiri ve su\u00e7lamalar\u0131n yan\u0131s\u0131ra, \u00f6rg\u00fctsel konularda da Genel Konsey’e ve Marx’a sald\u0131r\u0131yorlard\u0131. <\/p>\n
\tBunlar\u0131n, \u00f6rg\u00fctlenme konusunda, Enternasyonal’in Genel Konseyi’ne ve Marx’a kar\u015f\u0131 su\u00e7lamalar\u0131 kabaca \u015funlard\u0131: 1)”a\u015fa\u011f\u0131dan yukar\u0131ya do\u011fru \u00f6rg\u00fctlenme” ilkesini temel almamak; 2) \u00f6rg\u00fct y\u00f6netiminde ”otoriterlik”, ”diktat\u00f6rl\u00fck”; 3)”\u015fubelerin \u00f6zerkli\u011fini tan\u0131mamak”, 4) ”merkeziyet\u00e7ilik”… <\/p>\n
\tBakunincilerin vaktiyle Marksistlere y\u00f6neltti\u011fi su\u00e7lamalar y\u00fczy\u0131l\u0131m\u0131z\u0131n ba\u015f\u0131nda ”21. Y\u00fczy\u0131l \u00d6zg\u00fcrl\u00fck ve Sosyalizm Manifestosu” yazan deha taraf\u0131ndan 20. YY kom\u00fcnist partilerine bug\u00fcn y\u00f6neltiliyor. Ge\u00e7mi\u015fin ideolojik, teorik, politik, \u00f6rg\u00fctsel birikimlerinin pek \u00e7o\u011funun art\u0131k g\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fcze uymad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131; dolay\u0131s\u0131yla b\u00fct\u00fcn bu konularda ”ge\u00e7mi\u015ften k\u00f6kl\u00fc bi\u00e7imde kopmak” ve ”yeniden \u00fcretim yapmak” gerekti\u011fini savunan bu yazar s\u00f6zkonusu konular \u00fczerine epeydir yaz\u0131p duruyor.<\/p>\n
\tBu bay\u0131n, Bakunin ve hempalar\u0131ndan 170 y\u0131l sonra yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 \u015fey esasen eski anar\u015fist ”yan\u0131lg\u0131lar\u0131 tekrarlamak”tan; hatta daha ileri gidip bunlar\u0131 ”yeni fikirler” olarak yutturmaya kalk\u0131\u015fmaktan ba\u015fka bir \u015fey de\u011fil. Bakuninciler’den tek fark\u0131; birincilerin devlet ve iktidar kavramlar\u0131n\u0131 tamamen reddetmeleri; bu bay\u0131n ise ”partinin de\u011fil halk\u0131n iktidar\u0131n\u0131” \u00f6ne s\u00fcren demagojik s\u00f6ylemidir. Bu, \u00e7ok yeni m\u00fcthi\u015f bir ke\u015fif de\u011fil. T\u00fcm sosyalizm d\u00fc\u015fmanlar\u0131 seneler boyunca sosyalist rejimleri ”demir perde” olarak adland\u0131rd\u0131lar; oralarda ”parti diktat\u00f6rl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc”n\u00fcn egemen oldu\u011funu propaganda ettiler. <\/p>\n
\tManifestocunun \u015fu s\u00f6zleri, savundu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerin \u00f6z\u00fcn\u00fc net bi\u00e7imde ortaya koyuyor:<\/p>\n
\t”K\u00fcrdistan kom\u00fcnist hareketi, d\u00fcnya kom\u00fcnist hareketini, Leninist \u00f6rg\u00fct ba\u015fta olmak \u00fczere, 20. YY kom\u00fcnist \u00f6rg\u00fct teorisini yarat\u0131c\u0131 katk\u0131 ile yeniden \u00fcretmeye \u00e7a\u011f\u0131r\u0131r. Daha somutta; partinin de\u011fil halk\u0131n iktidar\u0131n\u0131; parti i\u015fleyi\u015finde do\u011frudan demokrasiyi ve kadrolardan \u00f6teye yap\u0131n\u0131n demokratik i\u015fleyi\u015fini; merkezin yukar\u0131dan a\u015fa\u011f\u0131ya yerelle\u015fmesi yerine yerelin merkezile\u015fmesini; disiplin i\u00e7erisinde \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fck yerine \u00f6zg\u00fcrl\u00fck i\u00e7erisinde disiplini ve bunlar\u0131n organik birli\u011fi olarak merkezde de\u011fil g\u00f6vdede g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc \u00f6rg\u00fctlenme modelini evrensel ve \u00f6zg\u00fcn \u00e7izgileriyle yaratma g\u00f6reviyle y\u00fczy\u00fcze oldu\u011fumuzu belirtir.” [”21. Y\u00fczy\u0131l \u00d6zg\u00fcrl\u00fck ve Sosyalizm Manifestosu”, sayfa 39 – 40]\n
\t”Sol kom\u00fcnistler”in, Bakunincilerin ve \u00f6teki sapk\u0131n mezhep \u015feyhlerinin mezarlar\u0131nda kulaklar\u0131 \u00e7\u0131nl\u0131yordur! <\/p>\n
\tMarx ve Engels’in yazd\u0131\u011f\u0131 Kom\u00fcnist Manifestosu’na \u00f6zenerek 21. Y\u00fczy\u0131l\u0131n \u00d6zg\u00fcrl\u00fck ve Sosyalizm Manifestosu’nu kaleme alan yazar bahsi ge\u00e7en manifestosunda yaz\u0131yor:<\/p>\n
\t”K\u00fcrdistan kom\u00fcnist hareketi, ba\u015fta Leninist \u00f6rg\u00fct modeli olmak \u00fczere 20. Y\u00fczy\u0131l kom\u00fcnist \u00f6rg\u00fctlenmesini anl\u0131yor, kavr\u0131yor, fakat geli\u015fen, de\u011fi\u015fen, olgunla\u015fan d\u00fcnya ve \u00fclke ko\u015fullar\u0131nda aynen tekrarlanmamas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini de belirtiyor.” <\/p>\n
\t Bernstein, Kautsky ve \u00f6teki revizyonistler Marxizm’i ”g\u00f6zden ge\u00e7irme” ve onu ”a\u015fma” i\u015fine t\u0131pk\u0131 b\u00f6yle ba\u015flad\u0131lar: ”Geli\u015fen, de\u011fi\u015fen ve olgunla\u015fan d\u00fcnya ve \u00fclke ko\u015fullar\u0131”n\u0131 gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6sterdiler. Ko\u015fullar\u0131n de\u011fi\u015fti\u011fini, teorinin eskidi\u011fini, olgunla\u015fan d\u00fcnya ve \u00fclke ko\u015fullar\u0131n\u0131n yeni teoriler \u00fcretmeyi gerektirdi\u011fini iddia ettiler ve \u00fcrete \u00fcrete vaktiyle Marx ve Engels’in yenilgiye u\u011fratt\u0131\u011f\u0131 burjuva ve k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck burjuva sosyalizmlerinin teorilerini \u00fcrettiler. Yani biraz s\u00fcsledikleri eski pa\u00e7avralar\u0131 yeni k\u0131l\u0131f alt\u0131nda sosyalizme ge\u00e7irmeye kalk\u0131\u015ft\u0131lar. Ve ko\u015fa ko\u015fa son nefeslerini burjuvazinin dura\u011f\u0131nda ald\u0131lar.<\/p>\n
\tYazar\u0131n \u00f6nerdi\u011fi modelin birinci ilkesi:<\/p>\n
\t”HALKIN YER\u0130NE PART\u0130N\u0130N \u0130KT\u0130DARI”<\/p>\n
\t21. YY Manifestosu yazar\u0131n\u0131n ele alaca\u011f\u0131m\u0131z ilk ilkesi olan ”Halk\u0131n iktidar\u0131 yerine partinin iktidar\u0131” demagojisi 1920lerin Sol Kom\u00fcnistlerinin safsatas\u0131na ne kadar benziyor: <\/p>\n
\t”Kom\u00fcnist Partinin diktat\u00f6rl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc m\u00fc, yoksa proleter s\u0131n\u0131f\u0131n diktat\u00f6rl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc m\u00fc!”<\/p>\n
\t1920’lerin ba\u015f\u0131nda ”Sol Kom\u00fcnistler” iktidar\u0131 kimin y\u00fcr\u00fctece\u011fini soruyorlard\u0131.<\/p>\n
\t”… \u015eu soru ortaya \u00e7\u0131kar: Diktat\u00f6rl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc kim y\u00fcr\u00fctecektir; Kom\u00fcnist partisi mi, yoksa proleter s\u0131n\u0131f m\u0131?…<\/p>\n
\t… \u0130lke olarak Kom\u00fcnist Partinin diktat\u00f6rl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc m\u00fc, yoksa proleter s\u0131n\u0131f\u0131n diktat\u00f6rl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc m\u00fc hedeflememiz gerekir?!!…” [”Sol Radikalizm” Kom\u00fcnizmin \u00c7ocukluk Hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131, sayfa 32 – 33, \u0130nter Yay\u0131nlar\u0131]\n
\tAyn\u0131 soru, de\u011fi\u015fik bi\u00e7imde, bol\u015fevik partisi kongrelerinde de g\u00fcndeme getirildi. <\/p>\n
\tVIII. Kongre’de (Mart 1919) ”Organizasyon Sorunlar\u0131na Dair Karar Tasar\u0131lar\u0131” tart\u0131\u015f\u0131l\u0131rken partinin iktidardaki rol\u00fcn\u00fc diktat\u00f6rl\u00fck ve oligar\u015fiklik olarak yaftalayan Sapronov ve Ossinski’nin ba\u015f\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7ekti\u011fi ”Demokratik Merkezcilik Grubu” (Desistler) ortaya \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131.<\/p>\n
\tBu grup (26 Mart – 5 Nisan 1920)’de yap\u0131lan RKP(B) IX. Kongresi’nde de ayn\u0131 arg\u00fcmanlarla muhalefet ettiler.<\/p>\n
\tRKP(B)’nin 8 – 16 Mart 1921’de yap\u0131lan X. Kongresi’nde ba\u015fka bir muhalefet daha tezah\u00fcr etti. ”\u0130\u015f\u00e7i Muhalefeti” ad\u0131n\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131yan anar\u015fist, sendikalist bir grup, ekonominin y\u00f6netiminin devlete de\u011fil, ”Genel Rusya \u00dcreticiler Kongresi”ne b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 istiyor; partinin \u00f6nc\u00fc rol\u00fcn\u00fc reddediyor, i\u015f\u00e7i s\u0131n\u0131f\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6nc\u00fcl\u00fck rol\u00fcn\u00fc sendikalar\u0131 vas\u0131tas\u0131yla yerine getirece\u011fini iddia ediyordu. <\/p>\n
\tLenin, bu kongrelere kat\u0131ld\u0131. Sol Kom\u00fcnizm \u00c7ocukluk Hastal\u0131\u011f\u0131 bro\u015f\u00fcr\u00fcn\u00fc IX. Kongre’nin hemen ard\u0131nda kaleme ald\u0131. Bu kitapta ”partinin mi diktat\u00f6rl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc, s\u0131n\u0131f\u0131n m\u0131 diktat\u00f6rl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc” sa\u00e7mal\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 sergiledi. Kitap Bat\u0131 Avrupa Sol kom\u00fcnistlerine kar\u015f\u0131 yaz\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131; fakat Desistler taraf\u0131ndan IX. Kongre’de g\u00fcndeme getirilen konular halen g\u00fcnceldi. Sapronov ve Ossinski grubu bu konularla ilgili olarak \u00e7ok say\u0131da karar tasar\u0131s\u0131 sunmu\u015f; bunlar \u00fczerinde hararetli tart\u0131\u015fmalar olmu\u015ftu. Bu gruba dahil olan kimselerin bir k\u0131sm\u0131 s\u00f6zkonusu tezleri savunmaktan vaz ge\u00e7ti, \u00f6zele\u015ftiri verdi. Ama bir k\u0131sm\u0131 halen g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerinde \u0131srar ediyorlard\u0131. Bunlar sendikalarda etkili olan eski bol\u015feviklerdi; Lenin bu kimseleri kazanmak istiyordu. O y\u00fczden kitab\u0131nda kendilerini do\u011frudan hedef almad\u0131. Zaten kongre tart\u0131\u015fmalar\u0131na kat\u0131lm\u0131\u015f; kendi g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerini ortaya koymu\u015ftu. Fakat kitab\u0131n\u0131 yazarken yaln\u0131zca Alman ve \u00f6teki Avrupa sol kom\u00fcnistlerini de\u011fil; kendi partisindeki zihni bulanm\u0131\u015f kimseleri de ikna etmek d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesiyle hareket etti\u011fi kitab\u0131n genel ak\u0131\u015f\u0131ndan bellidir.<\/p>\n
\tOysa bir y\u0131l sonra, 1921’de, tam da Kronstadt ayaklanmas\u0131n\u0131n devam etti\u011fi bir s\u0131rada, yap\u0131lan X. Kongre’de ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan ”\u0130\u015f\u00e7i Muhalefeti Grubu”na kar\u015f\u0131 bu kadar esnek davranmayacakt\u0131. Bu kongrede muhalefete ili\u015fkin al\u0131nan kararlar\u0131n ilk tasla\u011f\u0131n\u0131 Lenin yazd\u0131. [X. Kongre’ye sunulan 8 ve 9 nolu kararlar\u0131n ilk tasla\u011f\u0131 \u0130\u015f\u00e7i S\u0131n\u0131f\u0131 Partisi \u00dczerine, Marx – Engels – Lenin, Sol Yay\u0131nlar\u0131, sayfa 358 ve devam\u0131nda yer al\u0131yor.] Lenin bu taslaklarda hem her iki muhalefet grubuna at\u0131fta bulunuyor, hem de Kronstad ayaklanmas\u0131na de\u011finiyor; ilk tasla\u011f\u0131n 6. maddesinde ”Kongre… \u015fu ya da bu taban \u00fczerinde olu\u015fmu\u015f b\u00fct\u00fcn gruplar\u0131n (”i\u015f\u00e7i muhalefeti”, ”demokratik merkezcilik”, vb. gruplar\u0131 gibi) t\u00fcm\u00fcyle da\u011f\u0131t\u0131ld\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klar ya da bunlar\u0131n derhal da\u011f\u0131t\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131 buyurur. Bu karar\u0131n yerine getirilmemesi, partiden kesinlikle ve derhal \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131lmay\u0131 gerektirir” diye yaz\u0131yor. 9 nolu kararda ”i\u015f\u00e7i muhalefeti” grubu sendikalist ve anar\u015fist sapma olarak de\u011ferlendiriliyor. Bunlar\u0131n savundu\u011fu ”ekonominin y\u00f6netim organlar\u0131n\u0131 ”se\u00e7en” ”kongreler ya da \u00fcreticiler kongresi” \u015fiar\u0131n\u0131 mahkum ediyor.<\/p>\n
\tBu muhalefet gruplar\u0131n\u0131n ve Kronstadt isyanc\u0131lar\u0131n\u0131n parti \u00f6nc\u00fcl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcndeki sovyet iktidar\u0131na kar\u015f\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrd\u00fckleri temel slogan, ”partinin de\u011fil; halk\u0131n iktidar\u0131” slogan\u0131d\u0131r. Kronstadt ayaklanmas\u0131 d\u00fcnyan\u0131n ve k\u00f6kleri halen kaz\u0131nmam\u0131\u015f olan Rusya’n\u0131n b\u00fct\u00fcn gericilerinde, zafer kazanm\u0131\u015f sovyet devletini y\u0131kma umudu uyand\u0131r\u0131r. Lenin \u015f\u00f6yle yaz\u0131yor:<\/p>\n
\t”Bu ayaklanmada d\u00fcnyan\u0131n b\u00fct\u00fcn \u00fclkelerindeki burjuva kar\u015f\u0131-devrim ve beyaz muhaf\u0131zlar, yaln\u0131zca Rusya’da proletarya diktat\u00f6rl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn i\u015fini bitirmek i\u00e7in bir sovyet d\u00fczeninin sloganlar\u0131na bile sar\u0131lmaya haz\u0131r olduklar\u0131n\u0131 hemen bildirdiler, sosyal devrimciler ve genel olarak burjuva kar\u015f\u0131-devrim Kronstadt’ta s\u00f6zde sovyet devleti ad\u0131na Rusya’daki sovyet h\u00fck\u00fcmetine kar\u015f\u0131 ayaklanma sloganlar\u0131n\u0131 kulland\u0131lar. B\u00f6ylesi ger\u00e7ekler, beyaz muhaf\u0131zlar\u0131n, yaln\u0131z Rusya’da proleter devrimin kalesini zay\u0131flatmak ve y\u0131kmak i\u00e7in kom\u00fcnistlerin, hatta en solda bulunan kom\u00fcnistlerin rengine girmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015ft\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 ve bunu becerdiklerini kesinlikle kan\u0131tl\u0131yor.” (age, s. 359)<\/p>\n
\tDevrimden ka\u00e7an burjuvalar\u0131n Prag’da \u00e7\u0131kard\u0131\u011f\u0131 ”Volya Rossii” [H\u00fcr Rusya] gazetesi Kronstadtl\u0131 m\u00fcltecilerin ve ailelerinin anlatt\u0131klar\u0131na ve getirdikleri metinlere dayanarak yay\u0131nlad\u0131\u011f\u0131 Pravda o Kron\u0161tadte [Kronstad \u00fcst\u00fcne Ger\u00e7ekler] [Prag, 1921]kitap\u00e7\u0131\u011f\u0131nda ayaklanmac\u0131lar\u0131n \u00e7e\u015fitli bildiri ve duyurular\u0131na yer veriyor. ”Kronstadtl\u0131 Denizciler, K\u0131z\u0131l Askerler ve \u0130\u015f\u00e7ilerin Ge\u00e7ici Devrim Komitesi” ad\u0131na 7 Mart 1921’de yay\u0131nlanan 5 numaral\u0131 duyuru ”B\u00fct\u00fcn \u0130ktidar Sovyetlere! Partilere de\u011fil!” slogan\u0131yla ba\u015fl\u0131yor. \u0130lk c\u00fcmleleri \u015f\u00f6yle: <\/p>\n
\t”Mare\u015fal Tro\u00e7ki, kom\u00fcnist komiserlerin \u00fc\u00e7 y\u0131ll\u0131k otokrasisine ba\u015f kald\u0131ran \u00d6zg\u00fcr Devrimci Kronstad’l\u0131lar\u0131 tehdit ediyor. <\/p>\n
\tYeni Trepov, kom\u00fcnist parti diktat\u00f6rl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fcn rezil boyunduru\u011funu sarsan emek\u00e7ileri silah zoruyla ezmekle ve Kronstadt’\u0131n bar\u0131\u015f\u00e7\u0131 ahalisini kur\u015funlamakla tehdit ediyor ve emrediyor: ”Mermi esirgemeyin!”<\/p>\n
\tDevrimci denizciler, k\u0131z\u0131l askerler ve i\u015f\u00e7iler ”yetti art\u0131k!” ona g\u00f6re.<\/p>\n
\t \u00c7al\u0131\u015fan y\u0131\u011f\u0131nlara ne oldu\u011funun Sovyet Rusya’n\u0131n \u0131rz d\u00fc\u015fman\u0131 kom\u00fcnist diktat\u00f6r\u00fc i\u00e7in \u00f6nemi yok; yeter ki iktidar partinin, RKP’nin elinde kals\u0131n.<\/p>\n
\tO y\u00fczs\u00fczce, m\u00fctemahil Sovyet Rusya ad\u0131na konu\u015fuyor ve merhamet vaad ediyor.<\/p>\n
\tBu hunhar Tro\u00e7kiy, kom\u00fcnist opri\u010dninan\u0131n bu \u015fefi, RKP otokrasisi ad\u0131na ac\u0131mas\u0131zca kan \u0131rmaklar\u0131 ak\u0131tan, \u00f6zg\u00fcr ruhu bo\u011fan bu Tro\u00e7kiy, pervas\u0131zca Kronstad’a k\u0131z\u0131l bayra\u011f\u0131 dikece\u011fini s\u00f6ylemeye c\u00fcret ediyor.<\/p>\n
\tEmek\u00e7ilerin kanlar\u0131 ve tutsak edilmi\u015f ailelerinin ac\u0131lar\u0131 pahas\u0131na kom\u00fcnistler, kendi mutlak hakimiyetlerini yeniden kuracaklar\u0131n\u0131 umuyorlar. \u0130ktidara temelli oturmak ve b\u00fct\u00fcn emek\u00e7i Rusyay\u0131 ba\u015ftanba\u015fa sars\u0131nt\u0131, a\u00e7l\u0131k ve so\u011fu\u011fun u\u00e7urumuna yuvarlayan u\u011fursuz politikalar\u0131n\u0131 s\u00fcrd\u00fcrmek i\u00e7in kom\u00fcnistler denizcileri, k\u0131z\u0131l askerleri ve i\u015f\u00e7ileri bir kez daha ba\u015f e\u011fmeye zorluyorlar. Art\u0131k yeter! Emk\u00e7ileri daha fazla aldatamazlar! Kom\u00fcnistler, hevesleriniz beyhude ve tehditleriniz hi\u00e7 kimseyi korkutmuyor.<\/p>\n
\tEmek\u00e7ilerin devrimi \u015fimdi en zorlu s\u0131nav\u0131ndad\u0131r; onun seyri i\u00e7inde adi m\u00fcfteriler ve zorbalar Sovyet Rusya’n\u0131n \u00e7ehresinden silinip gidecektir; senin merhametine ise, bay Tro\u00e7kiy, ihtiyac\u0131m\u0131z yok!” (Dokumente Der Weltrevolution, Band 2, Arbeiter – Demokratie Oder Parteidiktatur (D\u00fcnya Devrimi Belgeleri, II. cilt, \u0130\u015f\u00e7i Demokrasisi mi, Parti Diktat\u00f6rl\u00fc\u011f\u00fc m\u00fc?), Frits Kool – Erwin Oberl\u00e4nder, Walter – Verlag Olten und Freiburg im Breisgau, sayfa 368 – 369] <\/p>\n
\tBu par\u00e7ay\u0131 ”halk\u0131n iktidar\u0131 m\u0131, parti iktidar\u0131 m\u0131?” safsatas\u0131n\u0131n daha devrimin ba\u015f\u0131nda, yaln\u0131zca s\u00f6ylem olarak de\u011fil, fiili ayaklanma bi\u00e7iminde de ortaya kondu\u011funu g\u00f6stermek i\u00e7in verdim. 21. YY Manifestosu yazar\u0131 ill\u00fczyonistlere has beceri ve k\u0131vrakl\u0131kla do\u011frudan Lenin’i ele\u015ftirmek yerine ka\u00e7amak yap\u0131yor. \u015e\u00f6yle diyor:<\/p>\n
\t”Kom\u00fcnist partiler ‘b\u00fcrokratikle\u015fece\u011fim, merkezi tanr\u0131 kat\u0131na \u00e7\u0131kartaca\u011f\u0131m, halk\u0131n yerine partinin iktidar\u0131n\u0131 kuraca\u011f\u0131m’ diyerek yola \u00e7\u0131kmad\u0131lar ama s\u00fcre\u00e7te b\u00f6yle oldular!” (age., sayfa 39)<\/p>\n
\tYani neye niyet, neye k\u0131smet olmu\u015f! Kom\u00fcnistler \u00f6yle niyetlenmemi\u015fler ama s\u00fcre\u00e7 i\u00e7inde \u00f6yle olmu\u015flar! Baz\u0131 bozucu fakt\u00f6rler, nesnel ve \u00f6znel nedenler b\u00f6yle bir sonuca yol a\u00e7m\u0131\u015f. Z\u00fc\u011f\u00fcrt tesellisi. Gayet ”iyi niyetli” Manifestocu’nun \u015fahane 21. YY kom\u00fcnizm projesinin de \u00f6ng\u00f6r\u00fclebilir ya da hesapta olmayan nedenler ve fakt\u00f6rlerle \u00e7uvallamayaca\u011f\u0131 ne malum? <\/p>\n
\tLenin s\u0131k s\u0131k s\u00f6yler: ”Demagoglar proletaryan\u0131n d\u00fc\u015fmanlar\u0131d\u0131r.”<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Marx \u015f\u00f6yle yaz\u0131yor: ”Her yeni tarihsel a\u015famada, eski yan\u0131lg\u0131lar, bir an i\u00e7in yeniden ortaya \u00e7\u0131karlar.” [”Nas\u0131l ki tarihsel her yeni a\u015famada, eski yan\u0131lg\u0131lar, ortadan kaybolduktan hemen sonra, bir an i\u00e7in yeniden ortaya \u00e7\u0131karlarsa, ayn\u0131 bi\u00e7imde Enternasyonal i\u00e7inde de, her ne kadar daha az belirgin bir bi\u00e7imde olsa da, sekter \u015fubelerin yeniden ortaya \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc.”] [ANAR\u015e\u0130ZM …<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[110],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.dengekurdistan.de\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2720"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.dengekurdistan.de\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.dengekurdistan.de\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.dengekurdistan.de\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.dengekurdistan.de\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2720"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"http:\/\/www.dengekurdistan.de\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2720\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2721,"href":"http:\/\/www.dengekurdistan.de\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2720\/revisions\/2721"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.dengekurdistan.de\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2720"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.dengekurdistan.de\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2720"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.dengekurdistan.de\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2720"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}